top of page

Boots Riley’s new film, “I Love Boosters,” was a vibrant, anti-capitalist fever dream. Everything about the movie–even down to its official poster–references the era of 1960s crime films such as “How to Steal A Million,” that blend crime, social criticism, and high fashion. This film does all the same things, but for a modern audience. 


It was as surreal as a Boots Riley film can be. There are stop motion characters in a world of real people, a building that is tilted at an almost 45-degree angle, though no one mentions it, and a demon model who takes the souls of his romantic partners by going down on them. Yes, you read that right.


The lighting and costumes were also colorful and visually pleasing. I was thanking my lucky stars that the main characters didn’t sacrifice being fashionable in their fight against capitalism!

 

These elements, alongside the writing and direction of Boots Riley, help to serve the film’s purpose. “I Love Boosters” is a satirical criticism of capitalism with plenty to-die-for fashion  moments along the way.


This review will contain spoilers!


The film follows a group of boosters (people that steal and resell clothes) called the Velvet Gang. When one of the boosters, Corvette (Keke Palmer), discovers that CEO and fashion designer, Christie Smith (Demi Moore), stole one of her designs and is selling it at her Metro Designers store, Corvette and her friends plan to steal from as many Metro Designers locations as they can.


Their cover: getting hired to work at the store.


At the same time, executives at the Metro Designers’ factory in China decide to implement teleportation devices to cut shipping costs. The employees also ask for better pay and working conditions, but Christie refuses to meet their demands. One of the employees, Jianhu (Poppy Liu), steals the device and teleports herself to America, where she plans to send all Metro Designers supply back to China until their demands are met. Eventually, she joins the Velvet Gang as they all have a vendetta against Christie. 

 

The way the employees are treated in this film is one of the most obvious critiques of capitalism.


They have to sprint to their lunch break, which is absurdly thirty seconds long, while the manager, Grayson (Will Poulter), gets a full hour. Corvette’s coworker, Violeta (Eiza González), gets a paycheck that is about $43,000, but after the company deducts money for employee uniforms and other costs, the check is reduced to just over $43. It’s over the top, but it gets the point across! 

 

Christie Smith is a symbol of capitalism in general and the “one percent.” She was livid that the boosters were stealing from her, meanwhile, she had already taken Corvette’s design and passed it off as her own. Christie also buys into her own self-importance and convinces others to believe her lies too, using propaganda. 


Throughout the film, there are a handful of side characters, such as Dr. Jack (Don Cheadle), who disguises his pyramid scheme as a self-help program, and Crying Black Mother (Kara Young), a woman on the news who says she wouldn’t want people to “bear the burden of free housing.”


She and the others seem unimportant until the final act, where it is revealed they have been working for Christie the entire time, having had their skin surgically removed so they can wear the skin of other people and promote Christie’s ideologies undercover.


They represent people who have bought into capitalist propaganda so much that they will sacrifice their own skin (their wellbeing) to keep the system going.

 

One of the “skin people” says she once acted as Candace Owens! This could be taken solely as a dig at Candace, but there’s a bigger message behind it. It symbolizes how all media can be a tool to control the narrative. People with platforms, big or small, can influence the public and get them to support things that benefit the system but harm themselves.


Of course, it wouldn’t be a Boots Riley movie without LaKeith Stanfield, who plays the demon model, also known as Pinky Ring Guy. His entrance to the film is jarring as he suddenly appears with no warning in an extreme, borderline invasive close-up, while Corvette is stealing from Metro Designers. Though he helps Corvette and her friends infiltrate Christie’s fashion show in the final act, the character’s purpose in the larger message of the film isn’t clear. On the surface he mostly adds to the surrealism, but in retrospect, it’s possible he represents the concept of sacrificing your soul for pleasure.


Most of his rare appearances in the film are when Corvette is in the middle of a plan with the boosters, and he tries to get her to go out with him. He could represent the temptation to give up the fight and give in to pleasure as a means of numbing oneself in the face of uncertainty. Or maybe he just symbolizes the bums we put up with to escape loneliness, who will actually suck the life out of us if we let them. Either way, Corvette rejects him completely, showing that she isn’t willing to give up her soul.


Refreshingly, the film doesn’t just criticize the problems with a capitalistic society; it offers solutions.

One being that we are most effective in fighting the system when we work together. 


Throughout the movie, Corvette hallucinates a giant ball of trash filled with overdue bills and eviction notices coming towards her, representing the dread and isolation of looming societal expectations. She also mentions many times that she feels alone.


As the film goes on, Corvette and the Velvet Gang gradually expand their circle, working with others to achieve a specific goal. By the end, Corvette isn’t alone anymore, and the giant ball of trash becomes small enough to pick up and throw away. It shows that fighting alone can be unbearable, but the way to handle the burden is by uniting.


At the end of the day, we have more in common than we think.


Another interesting detail is that the teleportation device has two other settings: deconstruction mode, which reverts objects into the raw materials that made them, and situational acceleration mode, which accelerates objects into what they will be in the future.

 

Deconstruction mode represents that the system doesn’t necessarily need to be destroyed. We need to take a closer look at the individual moving parts and understand how it works so we can rebuild it. Situational Acceleration mode represents future possibilities.


In the final act, there is a protest at Christie’s fashion show. On one side are the protestors, on the other, those who were guests invited to the show. When the boosters use acceleration mode on everyone, we see what they will be in the future: both sides are protesting together. When Corvette and her friend Sade (Naomie Ackie) accidentally accelerate a police car, it becomes a futuristic vehicle with all kinds of weaponry and destructive features. But when they accelerate the people, it makes them into a version of themselves that depicts unity.


That is how they win.

 

The film’s ending leaves us with a sense of hope. The Velvet Gang opens a community center to sell clothes, and Christie has to comply with the demands of the people who work in the Metro Designers factory.


It shows that regardless of how bad the world gets, future generations will still unite and fight for something better. This conveys a future of unity, a future that is hopeful in the face of bleakness, and it's a message the world needs to hear.

Money may not be able to buy you taste, but it sure can get you close to it.


The price of a ticket to the Met Gala for 2026 is $100,000, which is up 33% since last year’s price of $75,000. For context, an annual salary of $100,00 now provides Americans with the same kind of lifestyle that $80,000 would have given just a decade ago. In the same reality, Amazon workers have been organizing for weeks ahead of the Met Gala to advocate for its boycott.


Posters titled “Boycott the Bezos Met Gala” have popped up across NYC, highlighting Amazon's ruthless worker exploitation and collaboration with ICE. A notable display right in front of the Met Gala carpet showed a sign titled “Met Gala VIP toilet” which said it was “installed in honor of Met Gala chair Jeff Bezos” with a basket of empty water bottles because, the sign reasoned, “it’s good enough for his staff”. Combined with horrific workplaces with worsening labor rights, Amazon workers take home a median pay of about $37,000 as of 2025-2026, if they even make it home.


The Met Gala has been criticized for years for its invitees’ extravagant parading of their opulence and riches, but what happened this year?


Jeff Bezos, along with his wife Lauren Sánchez, stepping into the roles as co-chairs of the Met Gala—roles which they paid at least $10 million for—is just the latest move to assert influence and dominance in practically every aspect of American life by bleeding Amazon’s workers dry. It’s not a secret why Amazon workers are protesting this move. In fact, the reasons have been extensively documented. Amazon warehouse workers are twice as likely to be seriously injured than workers at other warehouses. Half of Amazon warehouse workers are reliant on public assistance programs like Snap and Medicaid as they struggle to make ends meet. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s 2026 investigation found that Amazon violated the worker rights of disabled and pregnant workers by denying medical accommodations and forcing unpaid leave. Warehouse staff routinely face intense pressure during peak production periods for Amazon, leading to thousands of workers suffering from musculoskeletal disorders and other preventable workplace injuries. 


Workers have responded to Amazon’s inhumane conditions by organizing for better conditions and pay, to which Amazon has retaliated with aggressive union busting. Amazon spent at least $26 million on firms that specialize in anti-labor organizing and union-busting techniques, according to the company’s 2025 filings with the U.S. Labor Department. And they paid good money for the consultancy for a reason. Amazon has flooded its warehouses with anti-union flyers in bathrooms and breakrooms, which workers could come across after their mandatory meetings with disinformation about unions. In fact, Jefferson County spokeswoman Helen Hayes asserts that the county sped up the red lights near Amazon’s fulfillment center in Bessemer, Alabama at the company’s behest, making it harder for union organizers to engage with employees and drivers at the traffic median.


Amazon’s worker treatment is not the only reason for the protest of Bezos and the Met Gala by association. The Met Gala’s lead sponsor has consistently supported ICE in their efforts to target minorities and terrorize vulnerable communities. According to the Immigrant Defense Project, Amazon Web Services supports the Department of Homeland Security via its cloud storage services. By being the primary broker of cloud storage for the DHS, the company allows ICE to collect information on immigrants and their communities to ultimately surveil and track people for deportation. And the environmental impact of these data centers? Just a few weeks ago, Amazon was to pay $20.5 million in a settlement over nitrate pollution from their data center facilities contaminating the groundwater in Morrow County in northeast Oregon. 


Vogue’s former editor-in-chief Anna Wintour said on her 2017 appearance on The Late Late Show with James Corden that she would never invite Donald Trump back to the Met Gala. But what does it mean when the Founder of Amazon—which contributed $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund—is now a co-chair at the Met Gala, which Anna Wintour runs? 


And what does a tech billionaire, who is rich off of the world’s largest e-commerce and cloud computing company, want with the world of luxury fashion anyways? For the longest time, Silicon Valley built its ethos on its rejection of art, taste, and beauty by refusing to consider style, artistic principles, and visual aesthetics. The tech world prided itself on its focus on function and utility over an appreciation for the arts, which would translate into a maintained distance from the humanities as a whole.


But as the tech industry has gained its current reputation as being empty and soulless, especially with tech companies sapping consumers’ privacy and money more and more every day, it is in dire need of a PR facelift. And what has the strategy been? Palantir has been cosplaying as a lifestyle brand selling apparel and tote bags. Zuckerberg even had a seat at this year’s Met Gala, a night that is dedicated to celebrating creativity and supporting the arts. 


But these billionaires only care about the arts to the extent to which their support can launder their reputations.


Days after the Met Gala, Meta is discontinuing end-to-end encryption of Instagram direct messages. Palantir has a contract with the IDF to provide AI-driven data analysis software for use in Gaza. All of this is what the Met Gala has served to obscure by being associated with Bezos, which is what he gains for contributing so heavily towards. Artists and creatives receive his monetary support, especially at a time when the increasing cost of living is crushing Americans nationwide, but only if they can ignore the structural violence of Amazon’s empire.


The Met Gala has effectively legitimized him culturally, and others like him, in the eyes of the public. A public that is waking up to the violence being perpetuated by tech companies and the billionaires that benefit from them.


This is not to imply that union-busting and practices are mutually exclusive from the Met Gala itself, either. Ahead of the 2026 Met Gala, unionized workers at the Metropolitan Museum of Art posted that 91% of the museum’s hourly staff and 27% of salaried staff earn less than a living wage.


Condé Nast, the primary organizer and media partner for the Met Gala, has been accused of engaging in retaliatory and anti-union behavior. The union, Condé United, which is affiliated with the NewsGuild of New York, states that Condé Nast fired four union leaders and suspended others after a confrontation with the company’s HR over the layoffs and closure of Teen Vogue. Teen Vogue was known for its youth-focused political coverage, and its closure marked another hit to candid reporting at a time when hard-hitting journalism is needed most, while newspapers all over the country close.


Fashion, and the arts as a whole, has always sought to encapsulate and represent the human experience. But after depleting natural capital by polluting our water and exhausting human capital by working employees to death, Amazon and other tech giants are now coming for cultural capital as a way to validate their existence in our society.


An existence that they’ve built by betraying every facet of the social contract, when at the very least, they could pay their share in taxes.


If our understanding of what it means to be human is going to be shaped by tech companies’ money in arenas such as fashion, what does that say about our sense of humanity?


Danny Colon wants you to commit to the bit.


Last weekend, Founder and owner of Electrix Vintage, Danny Colon, opened a new store in a beautiful space located in the lovely community of Stuyvesant Heights. Colon, who has a background in the theater industry, which is evident in the stories he tells through his clothing, space, and business model, attracts long lines to the stores Brooklyn street.


Danny Colon, owner and founder of Electrix Vintage
Danny Colon, owner and founder of Electrix Vintage

Their new store, at 103 Stuyvesant Ave, offers racks of affordable curated collections, organized by clothing type and price points, along with vintage trinkets, digital cameras, accessories, and more. Electrix also offers fill-a-bag sales, where you can fill the provided tote bag full of clothes from their selection pile and only pay $10 for the whole tote and its contents.



While walking through the new store during their opening day, I saw families browsing, locals laughing, and friends gathering to support the new beginnings of Electrix’s Bed-Stuy location (needless to say, the vibes were immaculate).


After browsing and grabbing a bag myself, I sat down with Danny to chat about his inspiration behind the shop, the expectations of the new space itself, and the community he wishes to build through his growing business.



ANN TANKERSLEY: Electrix started selling in 2020. What do you think are the biggest changes you’ve made as a team to land you here 6 years later? 


DANNY COLON: Individualizing what we do rather than going with a group (in the industry). When we started our own independent pop-ups, that’s when we started to see results. There are logistics that can help us, but at the same time,

keeping the love for clothes number one always.


Prioritizing our curation, what we can get and where we get it, and keeping that all high quality at a fair price point.


For me, the joy of second hand is having “the find” without having to worry if you can afford “the find”. Changing our social media approach too… When I started being honest (on socials) and put myself forward, it built a bond with the customers and trust. People connect with us there and can see honesty and connect there. 


AT: You have a personal background in the theater industry and costuming. How do you think that manifests in the branding and processes of Electrix as a whole today?


DC: The throughline for costume was interesting because that’s how we started our rental business. That’s actually something that has grown our business too with promotion because people that pull those pieces will return for other (services) . Those things have led me to make more affordable choices for renters while maintaining our curation without having to pay $100 for a rental. Seeing what people make with that and their own art has not only pushed us forward artistically, creatively, and inspirationally, but sometimes you just see it and think, ‘wow, I love fashion’. This is why we do it, seeing how it’s used. There’s never not a benefit that has come out of connecting with other creatives in fashion and the arts. Art and fashion are so interconnected.



AT: Electrix offers many services from styling to costuming to sourcing, and of course, as a thrifting outlet. Did you start Electrix with all of these specialties in mind, or did one come from another? 


DC: Being a student [at] FIT and getting random changes bridged that, and sourcing just came from people asking. Finding our ways to aid the creative is what we’re always doing. The staff is all creatives, so we’re always finding ways we can open that door to someone and help someone out. Some seasons will be all costuming, others are all styling… I enjoy having it all and to play with it all.


AT: Your new storefront for Electrix Vintage opens today in Bed-Stuy. What do you want our readers and users to know about the new space and venture?


DC: We want creatives to connect with us and come to us with their creative ideas if they need a space. Hit us up people, we want you to be in here. Come in, talk, we are always here for it and open to collaborate.



This interview has been edited for length and clarity.


Check out Electrix Vintage: 103 Stuyvesant Ave, Brooklyn, NY. Open Fri-Sun 11 AM - 7 PM.

On Instagram at @electrixvintage, online at www.electrixvintage.com.

View upcoming events such as $10 Fill-A-Bag Sales, pop-ups and more events to come in the Summer at their linktree: Linktr.ee/shopelectrix.


You reached the end! Make an account to get updated when new articles and interviews drop.

bottom of page