top of page

At the top of spring, fashion fanatics on social media begin their preparation for the first Monday of May. The Met Gala, its yearly theme, and the guest list become the hottest topics of the season. While many look forward to a new red carpet with some of the most robust displays of high fashion in America, many use this time to remember the iconic 2018 gala, highly revered as one of the best.


The theme was “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination,” and opulence was the star of the show. The Metropolitan Museum of Art describes the exhibit as “a dialogue between fashion and medieval art from The Met collection to examine fashion's ongoing engagement with the devotional practices and traditions of Catholicism.” The display featured garments never seen outside the Vatican, and was staged for anyone to see. 







With a consistent obsession for the one-year exhibit, one has to wonder about the meaning of Catholic-specific devotion through clothing. Gen Z and their never-ending subculture aesthetics have created ways for worship, or a subversion of subscription to religion, to be stylized. From “tradcath coquette” and the aesthetics of “Ethel Cain core” to the rise of conservatism amongst a younger generation, the 2020s have proven themselves to be a slightly confused time for Catholicism. There’s an evident tug of love and hate from both ends of the spectrum of belief. What lies within the grey area, however, is fashion. 


Clothing has been an important staple in creating the status of Catholicism. As “Heavenly Bodies” explores, the Catholic fashion in medieval Europe became an important marker for how important cloth itself was to become within the church. In her essay, “The cardinal’s new clothes?” Emma Anderson explains how rags and simple garments were integral to bridging the gap between heaven and earth. Both Jesus Christ and his mother, the Virgin Mary, were ascended into heaven, leaving all of their clothes connected to their holy bodies, in a sense. In the following centuries, Catholic fashion aided in the establishment of its cultural hierarchy. The opulence that was evident in the robes that adorned cardinals and bishops, painted in royal pigments of crimson and purple, respectively. This display is meant to celebrate the majesty of God’s presence in this world, acting as an extension of the heavens. It also stands as a representation of the power and continuity that the institution of the Catholic Church has held over time. 


Totems from the Catholic Church play a large role in the manner in which its followers wear their worship. Representations of the Virgin Mary or imagery of the Crucifixion are circulated in the current landscape of how Catholicism is aestheticized for the new digital age.




While the Met’s 2018 display of Catholic fashion is a prominent mark for the current rise of Catholic aesthetics in cool girl fashion, it has slowly infiltrated algorithms for years and has culminated in an entirely new subculture. The fetishization of the religion can be tied to the fact that it stems from material culture where the physical pieces of memorabilia are meant to tie its followers to the divine. This makes the allure of the fashion pieces themselves enticing to those who either practice the way of the church or who grew up in and around it. 


The subversion of Catholic symbols in media dates back to the mid-1900s, implementing itself into mediums like film and music, which is inevitably how they trickled their way down into alternative fashion. From Rosemary’s Baby (1968) to Madonna’s “Like A Virgin,” the scandalizing nature of defying Catholicism’s core values are enough to ruffle the feathers of the general public. The iconography in conjunction with the highlighting of sins is enough for fans of pop music and horror films alike to follow in the footsteps of the potential blasphemous representation of their worship. Developments into the modern stan area are best highlighted in the Lana del Rey fandom space, in which her use of religious imagery in lyrics has created a correlation to what is now coined the #catholicaesthetic.



In the publication TeenInk, user pim2109 cites Del Rey’s “glamorization of passivity in the face of abuse” as a large reason that a younger audience is translating that into an aestheticized version of the concepts that surround the practice. The religious imagery and memorabilia no longer represents suffering nor does it bring followers closer to heaven, as previously proposed or even intended in the Middle Ages during the rise and domination of the Catholic church. It now visualizes submission of women, the devout followers, to a male authoritative figure, God himself. 


In a now deleted Tumblr post, musician Ethel Cain claimed we exist in the time of an “Irony Epidemic.” The singer wrote: “there is such a loss of sincerity and everything has to be a joke at all times.” The venn diagram of Ethel Cain stans and Lana del Rey fans likely has a larger crossover than many may realize, and while Cain is not necessarily speaking on her fanbase or the people that use the visuals that accompany her 2022 concept album, Preacher’s Daughter, the theory of the irony epidemic rings true to the aestheticization of Evangelicalism. The #ethelcaincore comes from fans taking the sole visuals and their own personal applications of the themes from Preacher’s Daughter (cannibalism, living in the American south, being raised religious/ Christian, etc.) and applying them to carousels on their personal grid. While Cain’s album centers on Christianity (and more likely, Southern Baptist) and its values that work to disrupt a home life and family, many have blurred the lines due to the Southern Gothic tone of the album and the connection of that particular aesthetic to Catholicism.


The irony, then, of practicing faith itself becomes relevant. 


Another major player in the influence of Catholicism in Gen Z fashion is the “Dimes Square” niche scene in New York City. Controversial figures and podcast hosts Honor Levy and Dasha Nekrasova have made their faith to the Catholic church public, and many online believed that their practice of the religion was insincere and being done in an ironic manner, where Catholicism is more of a vibe rather than a call to devote their life to faith. However, on a podcast, when asked about her choice to convert to the faith, Nekrasova states, “I think a lot of people think I’m being Catholic, ironically, which is not true. But it doesn’t really matter if you’re doing something ironically, because it still works.” Levy also mentioned on her “Wet Brain” podcast that if you perform enough rituals, “...then it becomes real, even if you don’t believe in it.” In this way, the religion finds itself a part of the irony epidemic. 







Low-resolution flash images of moss growing over the Virgin Mary or billboards that litter the Bible belt that call for drivers to be saved by Jesus Christ have become a hashtag subculture on social media. So where does this leave room or worship in the world of fashion? Shocking numbers of red votes in the 2024 presidential race that came from Gen Z confirms what many have theorized online: Conservatism is, and has been, on the rise. The life-altering event of the pandemic caused young people across the world to reckon with themselves in the space they grew up in, facing the parts of themselves that may have been buried in routine and life pre-2020. 


In a search for truth, community, and meaning in a world that continues to fail an entire generation, Catholicism finds itself on a steady increase in young people. This fact of Catholicism and, more importantly, its values on the rise in tandem with the attempt to subvert the practice by satirizing or aestheticizing it leaves too much room for ambiguity. Fear of AI and the unknown can lead many to revert back into a practice that feels traditional, and for those who were raised religious, it feels like a return to youth. The rosary no longer exists as a binary from a string of beads that count our prayers to a fashion statement that embodies female sexuality (a la Madonna) and having a cross hanging in your bedroom could be done in spirituality or in reference. The spectrum of devotion to rebellion of the Catholic church has grown immeasurably broad, and the same can be said for its fashion trends.

Is a country built on hypocrisy and deception capable of standing as

“One nation under God”? 


This question lingers in my mind daily as I continue growing into a self-liable citizen. Christianity sits as America’s predominant religion. As much as I’d love to believe it to be purely out of discipleship, the truth is quite the opposite. This country’s foundation, as some may know, is based on the Discovery Doctrine, a common practice of conquest and conversion. With conquest comes power above all else– above religion and above the people. Today, this system has rebranded itself as Christian Nationalism, a political ideology that works to fuse Christian religion and national identity together. This is the same driving force that has used the bible to justify disposition of indigenous peoples, slavery amongst nations, and authoritarian governments.


Now, how could such an entity be one “ordained by God”?


Surely, the Lord of love and mercy would say otherwise. As stated by Jesus and written in scripture, “They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules” [Matthew 15:9]." These same words hold up today, largely through a country pushing this nationalist agenda. 


1 Timothy 1:15 states, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”. 

When Christ walked this earth, his mission was to save lost souls, not governments or regimes– but people. If we take a look at America, we could easily note how difficult our leaders have made it for everyday people, who are often overlooked. This in itself contradicts the teachings of Christ. 


Here’s a little about Jesus: he was born a refugee who fled from persecution, came up humbly working as a carpenter, and was most importantly, a radical leader– spending his time with and educating the marginalized groups of the world (e.g., the impoverished, sex-workers,  and Gentiles). In doing so, he paved the route and showed us the true meaning of “loving thy neighbor”. This entails looking past race, ethnicity, and class, because through his power, love surpasses worldly identity. 


Allow me to insert two facts about myself– I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I am also a Black Woman in America. In addition to these two facts are two others about this country– In its true form, America is a western stagefront– manufactured to conquer above all else, hence my previous mention of the Discovery Doctrine. This country is also a system that prides itself on and under God. But how can the two coincide with each other? Is it even possible? 


In 1791, the First Amendment, [located in The Bill of Rights], incorporated the concept of separation of church and state. This, in simplistic terms, was meant to prevent the government from enforcing its own church. The amendment also created a sense of neutrality in regards to religion. For this, I am thankful. I have been able to express my religious customs freely, all while being able to walk into areas where others and their theologies have room to take up space. But even stating this as a lived experience, sits generally false.


Every day, we hear stories of marginalized groups in congregations, targeted in the nature of propagandic teachings, bigotry, and so much more. Just last month (September 2025), a white supremacist threatened to actively kill and terrorize practicing muslims at a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan. This is only scratching the surface to some of the extremities hate has taken to silence the voices of other religions. 


Furthermore, these same acts have been seen immensely throughout the Black Christian Church. The 1963 KKK bombing of Birmingham’s 16th Street Baptist Church, which killed four little girls, has haunted generations as a silent reminder of our enduring exclusion in this country. I could go on endlessly about these instances, but the recurring pattern is one of domination and the relentless pursuit of power in the name of white supremacy. 


This notion of supremacy often overlaps with nationalist ideologies, using Christianity and economic fears to justify the “purification” of the nation (as seen with Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Groups like Turning Point USA further reinforce this, targeting youth and grooming them into the ideology of Western “Christian” conservatism. The impact of this harm continues to produce mentally unstable and neo-Nazi-minded young people. These influences pacify their terroristic desires and tell them that they’re justified through God, just as this country's Founding Fathers. We’ve seen this with religious center threats, bombings, school shootings, and cyber attacks. With the authority of Christian Nationalism, we’re starting to see this with ICE agents and political leaders. Through the continuation of this agenda, we will see a growth of domestic terrorists in places of enforcement and power. 


So what are followers of Christ to do in this reality? 


When Jesus walked this earth, it is historically recorded what he did and how he acted upon his call to reconcile people with God. Christ guided and educated disciples in their youth. The disciple John was likely a teenager when he was called to Christ, while the others’ ages spanned from adolescence to Peter, who was thought to be in his late twenties or early thirties. Jesus knew to reach the youth because that is undeniably where the future starts– but he didn’t do so in the way many leaders do today. Instead of teaching the ways of a religious agenda, Jesus showed his followers how to live and educate radically against worldly agendas. In Christ’s movement, there is no space for confusion, no room for political agenda, and absolutely no capacity for hate. 


Just as Jesus intended us to live by love, so shall we do, as followers in today’s world. Before, it was Jesus condemning the religious leaders for living hypocritically and against outward appearance. Today, it is we who must denounce the strategic and perverse ways of Christian Nationalism and live by the truth that is Jesus Christ.



If you’re anything like the staff at 47Magazine or one of his 1.1 million followers, you will have been lucky enough to spot JJ Niemann on your TikTok For You Page. Creating a diverse slew of consistently quality and entertaining content, Niemann has garnered a loving and passionate fan base, as well as maintaining his “day job” - living out the career of his dreams. In this interview, 47Magazine was able to get down to the nitty gritty with JJ Niemann of what it means to be a social media influencer while also being a full-time actor. Niemann, the newest cast member of Hamilton, got open and honest with us about past projects, grief, rejection, and even plans for the big screen. 


47Magazine: How do you feel that being a social media influencer has affected your path as an actor? Has it hindered or supported your journey? 


JJ Niemann: The coolest, most tangible difference is that I now feel supported by an online community of millions of friends. At the stage door, no matter what role I’ve played that night, usually 50% or more of the stage door know me by name or have seen my content, and express that they were excited to see me in the show. It truly means the world to feel that support and to get to meet people IRL after connecting online and sharing common laughs and cries together there. Of course, having a platform comes with having some haters and naysayers here and there, which can feel overwhelming at times. But the pros WAY outweigh the cons, and I choose to focus on the joy that content creation brings me, and the joy I can bring to others.


47: Working in some of Broadway's most famous shows and theatres, some performers have built superstitions or rituals they live by to pull off a good show. Do you have any you’ve learned from past cast members or developed yourself? 


JN: Honestly, I don’t have any wild rituals! I just take properly warming up seriously - doing a vocal routine and physical routine before the show so that everything is in alignment. I do love to steam or nebulize my voice, and I swear by my Ricola for my voice and Tiger Balm for the aches and pains!



47: From Broadway to underground theatre, the arts have been graced with some truly amazing roles. What is your DREAM role (ANY show, ANY gender, etc)? 


JN: A dream role I’ve had since college is Frank Abagnale Jr. in Catch Me if You Can. I love roles like that where it’s truly a triple threat role - singing, acting, and dancing while leading big production numbers. However, if gender bent roles are an option, Anne Boleyn in SIX would be SO fun! I identify with her chaos.


47: Musical Theatre is full of powerhouses and iconic performers, who are your three biggest inspirations?


JN: I’m very inspired by artists that I’ve been fortunate enough to work with, whose kindness and work ethic match their massive talent. Susan Stroman, an icon and legend, ran the Smash rehearsal room as it should be - with kindness and grace. I was fortunate enough to play alongside Roger Bart in Back to the Future many times, and he truly took me under his wing, and I learned so much about comic timing and how to command a stage from him. Getting to witness James Monroe Iglehart tear the roof down every day in Hercules, but also be the sweetest and most supportive cast member, is something that really stuck with me. Those three really stick out to me at the moment.



47: Would you ever consider making the leap from stage to screen? Why or why not? 


JN: I’d absolutely LOVE to! The bulk of my training so far as a performer has been for on-stage performance, and I feel my skill sets lend itself naturally to the stage. I’ve definitely started to take more camera acting classes and have been pursuing some of those auditions. It’s such a different medium, and half of the battle is being in the right place at the right time for on-screen work. The other half is having the right tools in your toolbox to know how to best approach self-taping and auditioning for those jobs, which I’m actively working on.


47: With such a long history in the industry, you must have had your fair share of rejections. How do you react to “no’s”? What’s some advice you have for upcoming actors when it comes to auditioning and callbacks, and moving on from a no? 


JN: One of my favorite quotes from a castmate of mine has been “Rejection is Redirection.” We can be thankful for that. And a “no” isn’t even necessarily always a “NO,” sometimes it’s just a “not yet.” I think about doors that have closed for me in the past, and how thankful I am looking back that those doors closed, because it led me to a different door that was open for me, one that I was ready for, and one that was in more alignment with who I am and what I want. I often think about when I initially auditioned for Hamilton years ago, and I was considered for going on tour with the show. I was devastated that it didn't work out, and I thought that door was closed. I'd missed out on doing Hamilton, one of my dream shows. But… if I had taken that tour, I wouldn’t have been in NYC for my callbacks to book my first Original Broadway Cast, Back to the Future, which was a life-changing experience I needed. Now, two and a half years later, the same role I almost did in the touring production opened up in the Broadway company of Hamilton, and I’m getting to do this dream show on Broadway. It was just a “not yet!"


47: How do you react to a yes? What’s the most exciting “yes” you’ve gotten? 


JN: It depends, honestly! When you get a “yes,” it can be the most THRILLING feeling in the world. It means you got the job and put in the work to land that job. But then, immediately, you wrap your head around the fact that the hard work is just beginning, and the road ahead to do the work will be fulfilling but tough. The best “yes” I can remember was getting that call to be in Back to the Future on Broadway, covering Marty McFly. It meant I was going to be in my first Original Broadway Cast, and it also meant that I was going to get to take the final bow on a Broadway stage when I went on for the role. Even though I truly never doubted that the job was mine (I had a lot of intuitions and just a feeling about it), I had waited 5 weeks after my callbacks to hear back. It was like a wash of emotions when my agent called me right before Christmas in 2022. It was truly the best Christmas present ever!



47: I’m sure it’s hard to choose, having done numerous productions over the years, but what has been your favorite part of being able to work on Broadway?


JN: My favorite part of working on Broadway and in this industry is the community. Genuinely, I have met the greatest people and forged the most special friendships through showbiz. I like to joke to people that I got into theatre for “social reasons” in the first place, but it really is true - the best part about these experiences is the people you get to share them with.


47: Having a strong support system is important when doing full show weeks, pushing your body and mind to bring out an amazing performance isn't always easy. Who has been your biggest supporter?


JN: My biggest supporter and hugest fan my entire life was my father. He sadly passed in March, pretty unexpectedly, and it has been the most challenging chapter of my life I’ve ever faced, not having him to go to or call for life advice, career tips, or even the smallest things. However, I know in my heart of hearts he has the best seat in the house every night at my theatre and is cheering me on. I’m honored to be his son and to continue his legacy in this world.



47: To pursue a career in the arts is one of both triumph and uncertainty, for those who choose to do so, they are pushed by their “love for the game.” When was the first moment you realized this is what you wanted to do? 


JN: I had a director in high school when I did a summer production who told me and my parents that if I wanted to pursue this as a career, he thought I genuinely had what it takes if I pursued it and studied it in college. I always knew I loved theatre more than anything else, but I never really considered that I could make it, or even realized there were programs out there to hone my skills. Having that director believe in me gave me the kick I needed to audition for college programs and pursue training in theatre!


47: What’s one piece of advice you’ve kept with you along your acting journey that you always look back on? 


JN: In terms of keeping my head on straight, the best advice has been simple: what’s meant for you won’t pass you by. If it’s for you, it’s FOR you. That has helped me remember to stay in my own lane and path, and not look too much to my left or my right, getting distracted by what others are doing or achieving. Another simple bit of advice that has stuck with me is to “be the kind of person that I would want to be around and work with.” It’s a small world, so it’s always good to operate and act in a workplace or rehearsal room as the kind of person YOU would want to hire and be around every day.


This interview has been edited for length and clarity


Keep up with JJ on his socials: 

@jjniemann


Written by Lucy Anderson and Jazzi Almestica for 47 Magazine. 


Creative direction — Lucy Anderson (@lugzyjane), Toni Desiree (@tonidesireethomas)


Production — Emma Oviedo (@emmaovi_), Jazzi Almestica (@shes.so.dope)


Photography — Mark Bluemle (@barks.mindd)


Styling — Shelby Leeming (@shelbyleeming)


Makeup — Emma Oviedo (@emmaovi_)


Hair/asst. — Natasha Teiman (@natasha_teiman)


Clothing from Electrix Vintage @electrixvintage



You reached the end! Make an account to get updated when new articles and interviews drop.

bottom of page