top of page

Camaraderie has been an enduring element in female friendships throughout history. Whether in medieval convents or as newly working women in the past century, sisterhood and female solidarity have helped women fight against all kinds of bigotry, or at the very least, make persisting through it just a little more tolerable.

Women have typically been underdeveloped, if at all developed, characters. For the longest time, entertainment media in particular have represented the interactions between women and the relationships women have in their lives as unexplored territory at best and wholly inaccurate at worst. Female characters have primarily existed to support the often-male leading characters’ motivations and journeys, or as foils to enhance their “aura”. Disney’s early films portrayed women, even their princess protagonists, as passive maidens. Video games don’t operate much differently, like the ubiquitous Mario franchise, which has kept Princess Peach’s physical autonomy in a questionable state for most of the franchise’s existence, with her primary role having been as Bowser’s hostage that Mario must rescue over and over. Misrepresentation of women worsens with nonwhite female characters. Even if white heroines do get a chance at being at or near the foreground, albeit rudimentarily at times, the portrayals of nonwhite female characters are bastardized with shoddy stereotypes, such as black and brown women being depicted as unduly desexualized and undesirable or Asian women shown as overly submissive. 

With mainly male writing rooms and casting directors and editors and directors, where are women, and especially impressionable girls, supposed to find their stories on the big screen?


The 2000s and early 2010s saw a host of female-centered, primarily animated media in response to young girls consuming more digital media just like everyone else, with popular selections like the Barbie film franchise, the Monster High media franchise, the Winx Club series, and the Bratz series coloring my childhood. Such productions often included a mix of original and revamped content, with the latter in large part done by the Barbie film franchise, whose early works featured remakes of existing works like the Brothers Grimm’s Rapunzel or Alexandre Dumas’ Three Musketeers or Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake ballet. Even these remakes were a first for women-centered media. Now, women were at the forefront of stories and fantasies involving them. 


No, these stories didn’t just involve them; these stories were theirs. Women were the main characters in every possible way. They were active players in their stories with the most interesting backstories and the best supporting cast. Men were frequently relegated to the background, with their most significant role being as supportive love interests. Notably, the men in these productions were never dehumanized, and the most underdevelopment their characters may have seen was in terms of… computer-generated motion graphics. Characters’ relationships, whether platonic or romantic, were not going to be ignored. The respectful yet flattering attention of male characters could be appreciated—and sometimes even reciprocated—by female protagonists, who also didn’t slow down to save their kingdom from evil sorcerers.


Depictions of female friendships were realistic: women could disagree, argue, and fight, even as part of the plot or conflict in an episode. But sisterhood was never abandoned. Women were rarely pitted against each other unfairly, especially over a man, as most male-dominated media may characterize female connections and bonds.


The target audience—Gen Z and younger millennials—has now grown up, but pop culture has maintained the relevance of popular women-oriented media. Nicki Minaj, despite having since fallen from grace, paid homage to Barbie’s brand with lyrical references and prominently pink stylistic choices, so much so that her fanbase calls themselves “the Barbz”. Zara Larsson’s rebrand mirrors the design of the Winx Club protagonists, with neon pop colors and glitter galore. Bratz’s impact on women of color cannot be sidelined with the main cast being overwhelmingly nonwhite, challenging the European beauty standards that even Barbie upheld to some extent. Gen Z and younger millennials have now been able to use the styles of the beloved characters from the films and TV shows from their childhood to inform their own aesthetic choices in how they dress and present themselves, especially when they want to make a statement. It is media like these that gave women, whether as young girls or evolving teenagers, a space to healthily engage with topics like beauty and fashion and life, without thematically being too “adult”.


Stories about women and with women in leading roles don’t always need to be about institutional sexism and omnipresent misogyny with dramatic monologues on the seemingly inescapable nature of firmly established patriarchy. Those stories are undoubtedly important, and we need them too. Awareness is a necessary first step to having the intellectual tools for women’s liberation from any and all oppressive structures. 

But sometimes, women, and especially impressionable girls, need to be able to see themselves as fairies and princesses and adolescent magazine editors, and everything in between. 

Fantasy is a means by which we can conceptualize our dreams and desires through imagination. In order to do, we need to be able to think. And without imagination, thinking doesn’t extend much too far. It may be an idealist perspective, but if there were no idealists, I certainly wouldn’t be a literate college student writing and drinking Moscato I bought with money I earned, with no one’s permission but myself.

Black women matter. Black women in history have always been seen as “other,” or the other. She can’t be both a woman and Black. With that, she is placed at the bottom of the oppressed. As a woman, she’s expected to learn her home before her mind, find her husband before her heart, and have children—completely hindering her childhood to give new life what she couldn’t have.


She does it all with what she has and what she works her ass for. All in silence. Determination. And audacity. Never did she ask for a handout or for understanding; she just asked that you open your eyes to her pain. See through her eyes—her anger and her agency.


Black women throughout time have always been, and continue to be, seen as less and treated far worse. We tend to be the first at the scene and the last to leave. As Black women, we are born leaders—born women and born Black. Throughout history, we are seen as both the most influenced and the strongest. The phrase “strong Black woman” is normally associated with activism. In our perspective, these women come in many different shades of brown and vast personalities.

Strong Black women. Women who care. Women who expanded what it means to be a Black woman in the revolution—addressing issues such as education, health care, and the development of youth. Black women are natural nurturers. While challenging racism and sexism, they never lost sight of the passion that was the end goal: Black liberation and freedom for all.


Assata Shakur, born JoAnne Deborah Byron on July 16, 1947, is one of the greatest political activists in history. A revolutionary and member of the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army, the late Assata Shakur is who I would correctly define as a beautiful, Black, “angry” woman.


On May 2, 1973, Shakur—then a prominent member of the BLA—was involved in a horrific shootout with New Jersey State Police, which resulted in the death of State Trooper Werner Foerster and fellow member Zayd Malik Shakur. In 1977, Shakur was imprisoned. A normal day in May turned into the start of a never-ending journey with no destination for a long time—chaos filled with death, fear, and imprisonment.


In 1979, Shakur escaped prison and fled to Cuba under political asylum. Through her autobiography, she goes in depth about what she went through. She stresses her time in the BLA as well as her early experiences being incarcerated—the treatment cruel and unforgettable. This Black woman spent much of her young life in prison, unaware that this particular crime would be permanently linked to her. Her fight for freedom turned into a fight for survival for over 50 years, as she was hunted for the rest of her life.

She became the first Black woman ever placed on the FBI’s Most Wanted list, with a $2 million bounty announced in 2013. In her autobiography, Assata Shakur explains how it is our duty to fight for our freedom, no matter what.


“No movement can survive unless it is constantly growing and changing with the times. If it isn't growing, if it's stagnant and without the support of the people, no movement for liberation can exist, no matter how correct its analysis of the situation is. That's why political work and organizing are so important. Unless you are addressing the issues people are concerned about and contributing positive direction, they'll never support you. The first thing the enemy tries to do is isolate revolutionaries from the masses of people, making us horrible and hideous monsters so that our people will hate us.”

Leading through her struggles in life, and now in death, we celebrate this strong Black woman for her fight against injustice. That is why we say her name:

Assata Shakur.

Breonna Taylor.

Sandra Bland.

Tanisha Anderson.

Korryn Gaines.

Michelle Cusseaux.

Kayla Moore.

Rekia Boyd.

And to the many more beautiful, “angry” Black women whose lives were ruined by racism.

Is a country built on hypocrisy and deception capable of standing as

“One nation under God”? 


This question lingers in my mind daily as I continue growing into a self-liable citizen. Christianity sits as America’s predominant religion. As much as I’d love to believe it to be purely out of discipleship, the truth is quite the opposite. This country’s foundation, as some may know, is based on the Discovery Doctrine, a common practice of conquest and conversion. With conquest comes power above all else– above religion and above the people. Today, this system has rebranded itself as Christian Nationalism, a political ideology that works to fuse Christian religion and national identity together. This is the same driving force that has used the bible to justify disposition of indigenous peoples, slavery amongst nations, and authoritarian governments.


Now, how could such an entity be one “ordained by God”?


Surely, the Lord of love and mercy would say otherwise. As stated by Jesus and written in scripture, “They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules” [Matthew 15:9]." These same words hold up today, largely through a country pushing this nationalist agenda. 


1 Timothy 1:15 states, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”. 

When Christ walked this earth, his mission was to save lost souls, not governments or regimes– but people. If we take a look at America, we could easily note how difficult our leaders have made it for everyday people, who are often overlooked. This in itself contradicts the teachings of Christ. 


Here’s a little about Jesus: he was born a refugee who fled from persecution, came up humbly working as a carpenter, and was most importantly, a radical leader– spending his time with and educating the marginalized groups of the world (e.g., the impoverished, sex-workers,  and Gentiles). In doing so, he paved the route and showed us the true meaning of “loving thy neighbor”. This entails looking past race, ethnicity, and class, because through his power, love surpasses worldly identity. 


Allow me to insert two facts about myself– I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I am also a Black Woman in America. In addition to these two facts are two others about this country– In its true form, America is a western stagefront– manufactured to conquer above all else, hence my previous mention of the Discovery Doctrine. This country is also a system that prides itself on and under God. But how can the two coincide with each other? Is it even possible? 


In 1791, the First Amendment, [located in The Bill of Rights], incorporated the concept of separation of church and state. This, in simplistic terms, was meant to prevent the government from enforcing its own church. The amendment also created a sense of neutrality in regards to religion. For this, I am thankful. I have been able to express my religious customs freely, all while being able to walk into areas where others and their theologies have room to take up space. But even stating this as a lived experience, sits generally false.


Every day, we hear stories of marginalized groups in congregations, targeted in the nature of propagandic teachings, bigotry, and so much more. Just last month (September 2025), a white supremacist threatened to actively kill and terrorize practicing muslims at a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan. This is only scratching the surface to some of the extremities hate has taken to silence the voices of other religions. 


Furthermore, these same acts have been seen immensely throughout the Black Christian Church. The 1963 KKK bombing of Birmingham’s 16th Street Baptist Church, which killed four little girls, has haunted generations as a silent reminder of our enduring exclusion in this country. I could go on endlessly about these instances, but the recurring pattern is one of domination and the relentless pursuit of power in the name of white supremacy. 


This notion of supremacy often overlaps with nationalist ideologies, using Christianity and economic fears to justify the “purification” of the nation (as seen with Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Groups like Turning Point USA further reinforce this, targeting youth and grooming them into the ideology of Western “Christian” conservatism. The impact of this harm continues to produce mentally unstable and neo-Nazi-minded young people. These influences pacify their terroristic desires and tell them that they’re justified through God, just as this country's Founding Fathers. We’ve seen this with religious center threats, bombings, school shootings, and cyber attacks. With the authority of Christian Nationalism, we’re starting to see this with ICE agents and political leaders. Through the continuation of this agenda, we will see a growth of domestic terrorists in places of enforcement and power. 


So what are followers of Christ to do in this reality? 


When Jesus walked this earth, it is historically recorded what he did and how he acted upon his call to reconcile people with God. Christ guided and educated disciples in their youth. The disciple John was likely a teenager when he was called to Christ, while the others’ ages spanned from adolescence to Peter, who was thought to be in his late twenties or early thirties. Jesus knew to reach the youth because that is undeniably where the future starts– but he didn’t do so in the way many leaders do today. Instead of teaching the ways of a religious agenda, Jesus showed his followers how to live and educate radically against worldly agendas. In Christ’s movement, there is no space for confusion, no room for political agenda, and absolutely no capacity for hate. 


Just as Jesus intended us to live by love, so shall we do, as followers in today’s world. Before, it was Jesus condemning the religious leaders for living hypocritically and against outward appearance. Today, it is we who must denounce the strategic and perverse ways of Christian Nationalism and live by the truth that is Jesus Christ.

You reached the end! Make an account to get updated when new articles and interviews drop.

bottom of page