top of page

Camaraderie has been an enduring element in female friendships throughout history. Whether in medieval convents or as newly working women in the past century, sisterhood and female solidarity have helped women fight against all kinds of bigotry, or at the very least, make persisting through it just a little more tolerable.

Women have typically been underdeveloped, if at all developed, characters. For the longest time, entertainment media in particular have represented the interactions between women and the relationships women have in their lives as unexplored territory at best and wholly inaccurate at worst. Female characters have primarily existed to support the often-male leading characters’ motivations and journeys, or as foils to enhance their “aura”. Disney’s early films portrayed women, even their princess protagonists, as passive maidens. Video games don’t operate much differently, like the ubiquitous Mario franchise, which has kept Princess Peach’s physical autonomy in a questionable state for most of the franchise’s existence, with her primary role having been as Bowser’s hostage that Mario must rescue over and over. Misrepresentation of women worsens with nonwhite female characters. Even if white heroines do get a chance at being at or near the foreground, albeit rudimentarily at times, the portrayals of nonwhite female characters are bastardized with shoddy stereotypes, such as black and brown women being depicted as unduly desexualized and undesirable or Asian women shown as overly submissive. 

With mainly male writing rooms and casting directors and editors and directors, where are women, and especially impressionable girls, supposed to find their stories on the big screen?


The 2000s and early 2010s saw a host of female-centered, primarily animated media in response to young girls consuming more digital media just like everyone else, with popular selections like the Barbie film franchise, the Monster High media franchise, the Winx Club series, and the Bratz series coloring my childhood. Such productions often included a mix of original and revamped content, with the latter in large part done by the Barbie film franchise, whose early works featured remakes of existing works like the Brothers Grimm’s Rapunzel or Alexandre Dumas’ Three Musketeers or Tchaikovsky’s Swan Lake ballet. Even these remakes were a first for women-centered media. Now, women were at the forefront of stories and fantasies involving them. 


No, these stories didn’t just involve them; these stories were theirs. Women were the main characters in every possible way. They were active players in their stories with the most interesting backstories and the best supporting cast. Men were frequently relegated to the background, with their most significant role being as supportive love interests. Notably, the men in these productions were never dehumanized, and the most underdevelopment their characters may have seen was in terms of… computer-generated motion graphics. Characters’ relationships, whether platonic or romantic, were not going to be ignored. The respectful yet flattering attention of male characters could be appreciated—and sometimes even reciprocated—by female protagonists, who also didn’t slow down to save their kingdom from evil sorcerers.


Depictions of female friendships were realistic: women could disagree, argue, and fight, even as part of the plot or conflict in an episode. But sisterhood was never abandoned. Women were rarely pitted against each other unfairly, especially over a man, as most male-dominated media may characterize female connections and bonds.


The target audience—Gen Z and younger millennials—has now grown up, but pop culture has maintained the relevance of popular women-oriented media. Nicki Minaj, despite having since fallen from grace, paid homage to Barbie’s brand with lyrical references and prominently pink stylistic choices, so much so that her fanbase calls themselves “the Barbz”. Zara Larsson’s rebrand mirrors the design of the Winx Club protagonists, with neon pop colors and glitter galore. Bratz’s impact on women of color cannot be sidelined with the main cast being overwhelmingly nonwhite, challenging the European beauty standards that even Barbie upheld to some extent. Gen Z and younger millennials have now been able to use the styles of the beloved characters from the films and TV shows from their childhood to inform their own aesthetic choices in how they dress and present themselves, especially when they want to make a statement. It is media like these that gave women, whether as young girls or evolving teenagers, a space to healthily engage with topics like beauty and fashion and life, without thematically being too “adult”.


Stories about women and with women in leading roles don’t always need to be about institutional sexism and omnipresent misogyny with dramatic monologues on the seemingly inescapable nature of firmly established patriarchy. Those stories are undoubtedly important, and we need them too. Awareness is a necessary first step to having the intellectual tools for women’s liberation from any and all oppressive structures. 

But sometimes, women, and especially impressionable girls, need to be able to see themselves as fairies and princesses and adolescent magazine editors, and everything in between. 

Fantasy is a means by which we can conceptualize our dreams and desires through imagination. In order to do, we need to be able to think. And without imagination, thinking doesn’t extend much too far. It may be an idealist perspective, but if there were no idealists, I certainly wouldn’t be a literate college student writing and drinking Moscato I bought with money I earned, with no one’s permission but myself.



Have you ever heard of the pink tax? No, I’m not specifically talking about the color pink or your actual taxes, but an extra cost that’s often added to products and services marketed toward women. It’s basically gender-based pricing, where items marketed toward women are more expensive than the same or very similar items marketed toward men. This directly impacts women’s buying power, with studies showing personal care products can be roughly 13% more expensive than men’s, creating a substantial financial burden over time.


A lot of these products are things society says women have to have, and many of them we realistically can’t go without. For instance, personal care items that we use regularly and most times, even monthly, are affected by the pink tax. Things like razors, deodorant, lotion, clothing, and even services often have a male counterpart that is cheaper, even though the product is basically the same.


Even when you look at actual products, you can see the difference. At Target, a men’s Degree Cool Rush deodorant is priced lower than a women’s Degree MotionSense deodorant, even though they serve the same purpose. 


This pricing difference even starts with kids. A Spider-Man bike helmet marketed toward boys can be significantly cheaper than a nearly identical Spider-Man “Ghost-Spider” helmet marketed toward girls, just because it’s pink and branded differently. It shows how early this kind of pricing starts, even when the product itself is basically the same.

While it’s called a “tax,” it’s not actually a government tax. It’s more of a price markup, mostly caused by marketing

tactics. Companies often claim the higher prices are due to production differences, like adding colors or scents, but realistically, those small changes don’t justify the consistent price gap. We don’t need pink versions of products; we need products that are safe, effective, and affordable.

There’s also something called the tampon tax, which refers to the sales tax placed on essential menstrual products. These are necessary items, not luxury goods, yet they are still taxed in many places. Some states are starting to remove this tax, but it’s still an issue.


The pink tax can be fought in small ways, like buying the “men’s” version of products when they’re cheaper, but that doesn’t fix the bigger problem. This is really a form of price discrimination, and it’s something women deal with every day, whether they realize it or not.


The impact adds up. Women can end up paying up to $2,000 more per year for similar products. Over a lifetime, that’s a huge amount of money just because of gender-based marketing. On top of existing wage gaps and inequality in the workforce, this becomes just one more financial burden.


So is this really the cost of being a woman? It might sound like a theory, but there’s strong evidence that it’s happening. The pink tax shows how inequality can exist in everyday things, even in something as simple as buying deodorant or a bike helmet.


References ;






Vs 




And 



vs


Black women matter. Black women in history have always been seen as “other,” or the other. She can’t be both a woman and Black. With that, she is placed at the bottom of the oppressed. As a woman, she’s expected to learn her home before her mind, find her husband before her heart, and have children—completely hindering her childhood to give new life what she couldn’t have.


She does it all with what she has and what she works her ass for. All in silence. Determination. And audacity. Never did she ask for a handout or for understanding; she just asked that you open your eyes to her pain. See through her eyes—her anger and her agency.


Black women throughout time have always been, and continue to be, seen as less and treated far worse. We tend to be the first at the scene and the last to leave. As Black women, we are born leaders—born women and born Black. Throughout history, we are seen as both the most influenced and the strongest. The phrase “strong Black woman” is normally associated with activism. In our perspective, these women come in many different shades of brown and vast personalities.

Strong Black women. Women who care. Women who expanded what it means to be a Black woman in the revolution—addressing issues such as education, health care, and the development of youth. Black women are natural nurturers. While challenging racism and sexism, they never lost sight of the passion that was the end goal: Black liberation and freedom for all.


Assata Shakur, born JoAnne Deborah Byron on July 16, 1947, is one of the greatest political activists in history. A revolutionary and member of the Black Panther Party and the Black Liberation Army, the late Assata Shakur is who I would correctly define as a beautiful, Black, “angry” woman.


On May 2, 1973, Shakur—then a prominent member of the BLA—was involved in a horrific shootout with New Jersey State Police, which resulted in the death of State Trooper Werner Foerster and fellow member Zayd Malik Shakur. In 1977, Shakur was imprisoned. A normal day in May turned into the start of a never-ending journey with no destination for a long time—chaos filled with death, fear, and imprisonment.


In 1979, Shakur escaped prison and fled to Cuba under political asylum. Through her autobiography, she goes in depth about what she went through. She stresses her time in the BLA as well as her early experiences being incarcerated—the treatment cruel and unforgettable. This Black woman spent much of her young life in prison, unaware that this particular crime would be permanently linked to her. Her fight for freedom turned into a fight for survival for over 50 years, as she was hunted for the rest of her life.

She became the first Black woman ever placed on the FBI’s Most Wanted list, with a $2 million bounty announced in 2013. In her autobiography, Assata Shakur explains how it is our duty to fight for our freedom, no matter what.


“No movement can survive unless it is constantly growing and changing with the times. If it isn't growing, if it's stagnant and without the support of the people, no movement for liberation can exist, no matter how correct its analysis of the situation is. That's why political work and organizing are so important. Unless you are addressing the issues people are concerned about and contributing positive direction, they'll never support you. The first thing the enemy tries to do is isolate revolutionaries from the masses of people, making us horrible and hideous monsters so that our people will hate us.”

Leading through her struggles in life, and now in death, we celebrate this strong Black woman for her fight against injustice. That is why we say her name:

Assata Shakur.

Breonna Taylor.

Sandra Bland.

Tanisha Anderson.

Korryn Gaines.

Michelle Cusseaux.

Kayla Moore.

Rekia Boyd.

And to the many more beautiful, “angry” Black women whose lives were ruined by racism.

You reached the end! Make an account to get updated when new articles and interviews drop.

bottom of page