Devotion through Fashion

At the top of spring, fashion fanatics on social media begin their preparation for the first Monday of May. The Met Gala, its yearly theme, and the guest list become the hottest topics of the season. While many look forward to a new red carpet with some of the most robust displays of high fashion in America, many use this time to remember the iconic 2018 gala, highly revered as one of the best.

The theme was “Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination,” and opulence was the star of the show. The Metropolitan Museum of Art describes the exhibit as “a dialogue between fashion and medieval art from The Met collection to examine fashion's ongoing engagement with the devotional practices and traditions of Catholicism.” The display featured garments never seen outside the Vatican, and was staged for anyone to see. 

With a consistent obsession for the one-year exhibit, one has to wonder about the meaning of Catholic-specific devotion through clothing. Gen Z and their never-ending subculture aesthetics have created ways for worship, or a subversion of subscription to religion, to be stylized. From “tradcath coquette” and the aesthetics of “Ethel Cain core” to the rise of conservatism amongst a younger generation, the 2020s have proven themselves to be a slightly confused time for Catholicism. There’s an evident tug of love and hate from both ends of the spectrum of belief. What lies within the grey area, however, is fashion. 

Clothing has been an important staple in creating the status of Catholicism. As “Heavenly Bodies” explores, the Catholic fashion in medieval Europe became an important marker for how important cloth itself was to become within the church. In her essay, “The cardinal’s new clothes?” Emma Anderson explains how rags and simple garments were integral to bridging the gap between heaven and earth. Both Jesus Christ and his mother, the Virgin Mary, were ascended into heaven, leaving all of their clothes connected to their holy bodies, in a sense. In the following centuries, Catholic fashion aided in the establishment of its cultural hierarchy. The opulence that was evident in the robes that adorned cardinals and bishops, painted in royal pigments of crimson and purple, respectively. This display is meant to celebrate the majesty of God’s presence in this world, acting as an extension of the heavens. It also stands as a representation of the power and continuity that the institution of the Catholic Church has held over time. 

Totems from the Catholic Church play a large role in the manner in which its followers wear their worship. Representations of the Virgin Mary or imagery of the Crucifixion are circulated in the current landscape of how Catholicism is aestheticized for the new digital age.

While the Met’s 2018 display of Catholic fashion is a prominent mark for the current rise of Catholic aesthetics in cool girl fashion, it has slowly infiltrated algorithms for years and has culminated in an entirely new subculture. The fetishization of the religion can be tied to the fact that it stems from material culture where the physical pieces of memorabilia are meant to tie its followers to the divine. This makes the allure of the fashion pieces themselves enticing to those who either practice the way of the church or who grew up in and around it. 

The subversion of Catholic symbols in media dates back to the mid-1900s, implementing itself into mediums like film and music, which is inevitably how they trickled their way down into alternative fashion. From Rosemary’s Baby (1968) to Madonna’s “Like A Virgin,” the scandalizing nature of defying Catholicism’s core values are enough to ruffle the feathers of the general public. The iconography in conjunction with the highlighting of sins is enough for fans of pop music and horror films alike to follow in the footsteps of the potential blasphemous representation of their worship. Developments into the modern stan area are best highlighted in the Lana del Rey fandom space, in which her use of religious imagery in lyrics has created a correlation to what is now coined the #catholicaesthetic.

In the publication TeenInk, user pim2109 cites Del Rey’s “glamorization of passivity in the face of abuse” as a large reason that a younger audience is translating that into an aestheticized version of the concepts that surround the practice. The religious imagery and memorabilia no longer represents suffering nor does it bring followers closer to heaven, as previously proposed or even intended in the Middle Ages during the rise and domination of the Catholic church. It now visualizes submission of women, the devout followers, to a male authoritative figure, God himself. 

In a now deleted Tumblr post, musician Ethel Cain claimed we exist in the time of an “Irony Epidemic.” The singer wrote: “there is such a loss of sincerity and everything has to be a joke at all times.” The venn diagram of Ethel Cain stans and Lana del Rey fans likely has a larger crossover than many may realize, and while Cain is not necessarily speaking on her fanbase or the people that use the visuals that accompany her 2022 concept album, Preacher’s Daughter, the theory of the irony epidemic rings true to the aestheticization of Evangelicalism. The #ethelcaincore comes from fans taking the sole visuals and their own personal applications of the themes from Preacher’s Daughter (cannibalism, living in the American south, being raised religious/ Christian, etc.) and applying them to carousels on their personal grid. While Cain’s album centers on Christianity (and more likely, Southern Baptist) and its values that work to disrupt a home life and family, many have blurred the lines due to the Southern Gothic tone of the album and the connection of that particular aesthetic to Catholicism.

The irony, then, of practicing faith itself becomes relevant. 

Another major player in the influence of Catholicism in Gen Z fashion is the “Dimes Square” niche scene in New York City. Controversial figures and podcast hosts Honor Levy and Dasha Nekrasova have made their faith to the Catholic church public, and many online believed that their practice of the religion was insincere and being done in an ironic manner, where Catholicism is more of a vibe rather than a call to devote their life to faith. However, on a podcast, when asked about her choice to convert to the faith, Nekrasova states, “I think a lot of people think I’m being Catholic, ironically, which is not true. But it doesn’t really matter if you’re doing something ironically, because it still works.” Levy also mentioned on her “Wet Brain” podcast that if you perform enough rituals, “...then it becomes real, even if you don’t believe in it.” In this way, the religion finds itself a part of the irony epidemic. 

Low-resolution flash images of moss growing over the Virgin Mary or billboards that litter the Bible belt that call for drivers to be saved by Jesus Christ have become a hashtag subculture on social media. So where does this leave room or worship in the world of fashion? Shocking numbers of red votes in the 2024 presidential race that came from Gen Z confirms what many have theorized online: Conservatism is, and has been, on the rise. The life-altering event of the pandemic caused young people across the world to reckon with themselves in the space they grew up in, facing the parts of themselves that may have been buried in routine and life pre-2020. 

In a search for truth, community, and meaning in a world that continues to fail an entire generation, Catholicism finds itself on a steady increase in young people. This fact of Catholicism and, more importantly, its values on the rise in tandem with the attempt to subvert the practice by satirizing or aestheticizing it leaves too much room for ambiguity. Fear of AI and the unknown can lead many to revert back into a practice that feels traditional, and for those who were raised religious, it feels like a return to youth. The rosary no longer exists as a binary from a string of beads that count our prayers to a fashion statement that embodies female sexuality (a la Madonna) and having a cross hanging in your bedroom could be done in spirituality or in reference. The spectrum of devotion to rebellion of the Catholic church has grown immeasurably broad, and the same can be said for its fashion trends.

Truth Over Perversion: Following Christ v. Christian Nationalism

Is a country built on hypocrisy and deception capable of standing as

“One nation under God”? 

This question lingers in my mind daily as I continue growing into a self-liable citizen. Christianity sits as America’s predominant religion. As much as I’d love to believe it to be purely out of discipleship, the truth is quite the opposite. This country’s foundation, as some may know, is based on the Discovery Doctrine, a common practice of conquest and conversion. With conquest comes power above all else– above religion and above the people. Today, this system has rebranded itself as Christian Nationalism, a political ideology that works to fuse Christian religion and national identity together. This is the same driving force that has used the bible to justify disposition of indigenous peoples, slavery amongst nations, and authoritarian governments.

Now, how could such an entity be one “ordained by God”?

Surely, the Lord of love and mercy would say otherwise. As stated by Jesus and written in scripture, “They worship me in vain; their teachings are merely human rules” [Matthew 15:9]." These same words hold up today, largely through a country pushing this nationalist agenda. 

1 Timothy 1:15 states, “Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners”. 

When Christ walked this earth, his mission was to save lost souls, not governments or regimes– but people. If we take a look at America, we could easily note how difficult our leaders have made it for everyday people, who are often overlooked. This in itself contradicts the teachings of Christ. 

Here’s a little about Jesus: he was born a refugee who fled from persecution, came up humbly working as a carpenter, and was most importantly, a radical leader– spending his time with and educating the marginalized groups of the world (e.g., the impoverished, sex-workers,  and Gentiles). In doing so, he paved the route and showed us the true meaning of “loving thy neighbor”. This entails looking past race, ethnicity, and class, because through his power, love surpasses worldly identity. 

Allow me to insert two facts about myself– I am a follower of Jesus Christ. I am also a Black Woman in America. In addition to these two facts are two others about this country– In its true form, America is a western stagefront– manufactured to conquer above all else, hence my previous mention of the Discovery Doctrine. This country is also a system that prides itself on and under God. But how can the two coincide with each other? Is it even possible? 

In 1791, the First Amendment, [located in The Bill of Rights], incorporated the concept of separation of church and state. This, in simplistic terms, was meant to prevent the government from enforcing its own church. The amendment also created a sense of neutrality in regards to religion. For this, I am thankful. I have been able to express my religious customs freely, all while being able to walk into areas where others and their theologies have room to take up space. But even stating this as a lived experience, sits generally false.

Every day, we hear stories of marginalized groups in congregations, targeted in the nature of propagandic teachings, bigotry, and so much more. Just last month (September 2025), a white supremacist threatened to actively kill and terrorize practicing muslims at a mosque in Dearborn, Michigan. This is only scratching the surface to some of the extremities hate has taken to silence the voices of other religions. 

Furthermore, these same acts have been seen immensely throughout the Black Christian Church. The 1963 KKK bombing of Birmingham’s 16th Street Baptist Church, which killed four little girls, has haunted generations as a silent reminder of our enduring exclusion in this country. I could go on endlessly about these instances, but the recurring pattern is one of domination and the relentless pursuit of power in the name of white supremacy. 

This notion of supremacy often overlaps with nationalist ideologies, using Christianity and economic fears to justify the “purification” of the nation (as seen with Immigration and Customs Enforcement). Groups like Turning Point USA further reinforce this, targeting youth and grooming them into the ideology of Western “Christian” conservatism. The impact of this harm continues to produce mentally unstable and neo-Nazi-minded young people. These influences pacify their terroristic desires and tell them that they’re justified through God, just as this country's Founding Fathers. We’ve seen this with religious center threats, bombings, school shootings, and cyber attacks. With the authority of Christian Nationalism, we’re starting to see this with ICE agents and political leaders. Through the continuation of this agenda, we will see a growth of domestic terrorists in places of enforcement and power. 

So what are followers of Christ to do in this reality? 

When Jesus walked this earth, it is historically recorded what he did and how he acted upon his call to reconcile people with God. Christ guided and educated disciples in their youth. The disciple John was likely a teenager when he was called to Christ, while the others’ ages spanned from adolescence to Peter, who was thought to be in his late twenties or early thirties. Jesus knew to reach the youth because that is undeniably where the future starts– but he didn’t do so in the way many leaders do today. Instead of teaching the ways of a religious agenda, Jesus showed his followers how to live and educate radically against worldly agendas. In Christ’s movement, there is no space for confusion, no room for political agenda, and absolutely no capacity for hate. 

Just as Jesus intended us to live by love, so shall we do, as followers in today’s world. Before, it was Jesus condemning the religious leaders for living hypocritically and against outward appearance. Today, it is we who must denounce the strategic and perverse ways of Christian Nationalism and live by the truth that is Jesus Christ.

Clothes and Culture: An Interview with HOESFORCLOTHES founder, Sasha Tarnovsky

Interviewed and Written by Jazzi Almestica and Lucy Anderson

What started as an online thrifting venture by creator and designer Tarnovsky from her LA apartment quickly turned into an internationally loved and admired fashion capsule inspired by the early aughts and the peak of socialites in the spotlight. While Tarnovsky is still working out of her LA apartment, the brand she created, Hoes For Clothes, has grown greatly beyond that. Sasha talks with 47magazine about her experience as a creator, designer, and Gen-Z fashion icon. 

Pictured Above: Sasha Tarnovsky in Hoes For Clothes

47Magazine: You’ve cultivated such a distinctive culture and style with your clothing brand “hoesforclothes.” What was the inspiration behind your brand and its unique name?

Sasha Tarnovsky: Honestly, the name just came to me sporadically. I have had this brand since 2019, and the original name was Grinchy Vintage (like, after the Grinch, haha), and then I rebranded to Cherubs and Cherries when I switched from selling vintage to selling more of my own designs. However, it never really felt right. Then, I remember being in a section for one of my political science classes in school, and it was around the time when the expression being a “hoe for” something was popular, like “I'm a hoe for peanut butter” or something, idk, and the name hoes for clothes came to me. I remember being so excited I could barely pay attention in class because I was like.. “This is so perfect,” but I didn’t know if it was taken already or not, so I sat through the class in agony, waiting to check my phone. Then I swapped it, and the rest was history!

47: Your clothing hits a specific spot for young adults, balancing hotness and humor, setting the trend for Gen-Z culture. Where do you find your inspiration and creativity? 

ST: I get a lot of inspiration from internet culture, memes, tv-shows and stuff like that. I have always really liked the 2000s aesthetic and used to be so obsessed with Jersey Shore and Desperate Housewives growing up. Everything else just kind of comes together! I also get lots of ideas from my followers, which makes it a really fun and collaborative thing. 

47: Starting a business is one thing, but turning it into a flourishing success is another. Did you think your business was gonna reach this level of fame?

ST: Literally never did I imagine something like this would happen! I just started it to sell off some clothing out of my closet originally, and help pay off some of my loans. I actually have a degree in political science. I was originally going to go into law, but then right around when COVID started, the brand kinda took off, so I didn’t accept any law school applications, dove head first into this world, and I haven’t looked back since! But being a fashion designer, or whatever you want to call it, was always my dream.

47: Who is your personal fashion icon?

ST: I don’t really have any celebrity fashion icons (although some movie characters definitely inspire me, like Shelley from The House Bunny, Edie from Desperate Housewives, etc). Still, I do have a few girls online that I would like to shout out for sure, my two favorite fashion girlies to follow are @beanieboylston and @linmick; neither knows I exist, but I have been following them for so many years. I am always inspired by the creative and fun approach they both have to fashion. For Lindsay (@linmick), I don’t necessarily even think our fashion style is remotely similar, but something about her vibe and style is so incredible. 

Beanie Boylston (@beanieboylston)

Lindsay Vrckovnik (@linmick)

47: What is one item of clothing you couldn’t live without?

ST: This is a basic answer, but either a black mini skirt or a pair of denim cut-off shorts. I think you can style them both in so many different ways, up or down, and they are both constants in my wardrobe. I felt like there was no “perfect” black mini out there, so I designed my own. 

47: What was your “I’ve made it” moment?

ST: I bet you could ask even Christian Dior this question and he would say, “did I really make it?!” or maybe that is just my imposter syndrome talking but I guess if I had to say something, I would say when I was still pretty new to all this and Tana Mongeau wore my “DUMP HIM” hat and had some paparazzi take her photo. To this day, I always think of her so positively regarding this situation because she did not buy the hat, she gently asked me for it, and I gifted it to her, and then when people asked her about where it was from she reposted one of those “Tana Closet” accounts to her story that shared my @. I have never seen her do that before for anyone. It was a gesture she absolutely did not need to do, because influencers like her are paid so much for their tags, but it was so sweet and kind and brought so many new eyes on me. I will always be so grateful for that, and I remember freaking out that THE Tana, who I used to watch on YouTube after school for hours, wore my trucker hat and shouted me out. 

47: What’s one piece of advice you wish you could tell yourself at the beginning of your journey? And what’s something you’d want to tell future you?

ST: I would tell myself to stay true to myself and my style because when you try to be something you’re not, you won’t succeed. The phrase “they can copy the recipe, but the sauce won’t taste the same” is so true. When I try to make items that I think people “want”, they never do well. All my best-performing pieces always came from the heart, and they were items I was personally inspired by. I am so grateful for the community I’ve curated on my social media, and I believe I got there by following my heart and doing whatever the fuck I wanted!